Czechoslovakia vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 352,955 t against 309,276 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 43,679 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 32nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 34th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 389,509 t | 335,299 t | 54,210 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 628,206 t | 493,423 t | 134,783 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 741,350 t | 608,718 t | 132,631 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 500,220 t | 430,466 t | 69,754 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Czechoslovakia, at 352,955 t against 309,276 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 43,679 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 32nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 34th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).