Djibouti vs Singapore: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Djibouti
- Singapore
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 820.94 t against 791.23 t in Singapore, a difference of 29.71 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Djibouti ranks 153rd and Singapore ranks 155th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 703.68 t | 4,920 t | 4,216 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | 804.08 t | 6,354 t | 5,550 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 371.75 t | 5,366 t | 4,994 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 551.55 t | 3,287 t | 2,736 t | Singapore |
| 2000s | 544.67 t | 1,010 t | 465.82 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 594.04 t | 859.11 t | 265.08 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 837.68 t | 795.53 t | 42.15 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Djibouti or Singapore?
- Djibouti, at 820.94 t against 791.23 t in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Djibouti and Singapore?
- 29.71 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Singapore rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Djibouti ranks 153rd and Singapore ranks 155th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).