Dominica vs Tuvalu: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominica
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 77.31 t against 16.65 t in Dominica, a difference of 60.66 t.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 4.6 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 178th and Tuvalu ranks 175th of 201 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,473 t | -9.61 t | 1,482 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 1,318 t | 7.08 t | 1,311 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 972.82 t | 23.12 t | 949.7 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 1,512 t | 70.44 t | 1,442 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 501.75 t | 80.92 t | 420.82 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 221.8 t | 85.31 t | 136.49 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 87.5 t | 75.58 t | 11.92 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 77.31 t against 16.65 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and Tuvalu?
- 60.66 t, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominica ranks 178th and Tuvalu ranks 175th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).