Dominican Republic vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports -28,675 t against -45,636 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 16,961 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 182nd and Kazakhstan ranks 183rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49,398 t | 117,848 t | 68,450 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 46,339 t | -47,415 t | 93,754 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 37,329 t | -55,757 t | 93,086 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 16,817 t | -97,825 t | 114,642 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen, Dominican Republic or Kazakhstan?
- Dominican Republic, at -28,675 t against -45,636 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen between Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 16,961 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen?
- Dominican Republic ranks 182nd and Kazakhstan ranks 183rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).