Eastern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eastern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 1.74 million t against 795,285 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 948,185 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 2.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 29 groups.
Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 490,727 t | 458,041 t | 32,686 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2000s | 550,190 t | 389,290 t | 160,900 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2010s | 998,403 t | 576,103 t | 422,300 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 1.45 million t | 769,590 t | 680,958 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Eastern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Eastern Africa, at 1.74 million t against 795,285 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 948,185 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Eastern Africa ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).