Equatorial Guinea vs Nauru: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports -16.9 t against -406.53 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 389.63 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 182nd and Nauru ranks 179th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -94.13 t | -14.31 t | 79.82 t | Nauru |
| 1970s | 203.54 t | -14.37 t | 217.91 t | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | -94.99 t | -12.47 t | 82.52 t | Nauru |
| 1990s | -129.52 t | -10.84 t | 118.68 t | Nauru |
| 2000s | -190.45 t | -16.36 t | 174.09 t | Nauru |
| 2010s | -414.3 t | -17.44 t | 396.86 t | Nauru |
| 2020s | -425.43 t | -16.78 t | 408.66 t | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Equatorial Guinea or Nauru?
- Nauru, at -16.9 t against -406.53 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Equatorial Guinea and Nauru?
- 389.63 t, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nauru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Nauru rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 182nd and Nauru ranks 179th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).