Estonia vs Georgia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 35,757 t against 33,491 t in Estonia, a difference of 2,266 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Estonia ranks 110th and Georgia ranks 108th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34,505 t | 37,901 t | 3,396 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 22,264 t | 28,269 t | 6,006 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 28,933 t | 21,993 t | 6,940 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 31,366 t | 36,565 t | 5,199 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 35,757 t against 33,491 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Georgia?
- 2,266 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Georgia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 110th and Georgia ranks 108th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).