Ethiopia PDR vs Sweden: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 155,332 t against 142,030 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 13,302 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74,560 t | 194,299 t | 119,739 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 99,612 t | 245,204 t | 145,592 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 97,862 t | 229,344 t | 131,483 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 122,077 t | 187,017 t | 64,940 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 155,332 t against 142,030 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Sweden?
- 13,302 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Sweden rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).