Georgia vs Hungary: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen

Georgia
35,757 t
in 2023
Hungary
37,015 t
in 2023
Georgia rank
108th
Hungary rank
105th

Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Georgia
  • Hungary
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 37,015 t against 35,757 t in Georgia, a difference of 1,258 t.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 108th and Hungary ranks 105th of 201 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 37,901 t 191,326 t 153,425 t Hungary
2000s 28,269 t 187,548 t 159,279 t Hungary
2010s 21,993 t 180,888 t 158,895 t Hungary
2020s 36,565 t 202,301 t 165,737 t Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Hungary?
Hungary, at 37,015 t against 35,757 t in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Hungary?
1,258 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Hungary?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Hungary rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
Georgia ranks 108th and Hungary ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).