Guatemala vs Honduras: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Honduras
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 103,867 t against 100,363 t in Honduras, a difference of 3,504 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Guatemala ranks 70th and Honduras ranks 72nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Honduras in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,047 t | 22,120 t | 12,073 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 19,798 t | 24,338 t | 4,540 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 39,003 t | 21,724 t | 17,279 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 77,449 t | 53,104 t | 24,345 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 85,414 t | 62,302 t | 23,113 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 107,468 t | 78,788 t | 28,680 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 121,840 t | 108,995 t | 12,845 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Honduras?
- Guatemala, at 103,867 t against 100,363 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Honduras?
- 3,504 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Honduras rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 70th and Honduras ranks 72nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).