Guyana vs Lesotho: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guyana
- Lesotho
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 4,553 t against 4,243 t in Lesotho, a difference of 310 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 25 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Guyana ranks 149th and Lesotho ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -4,027 t | 447.81 t | 4,475 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | -459.66 t | 1,516 t | 1,976 t | Lesotho |
| 1980s | -158.18 t | 2,138 t | 2,296 t | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 1,591 t | 3,150 t | 1,559 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 2,048 t | 5,074 t | 3,026 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 4,530 t | 4,633 t | 102.64 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 4,380 t | 5,214 t | 834.4 t | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Guyana or Lesotho?
- Guyana, at 4,553 t against 4,243 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Guyana and Lesotho?
- 310 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Lesotho rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Guyana ranks 149th and Lesotho ranks 151st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).