Hungary vs Latvia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Hungary
- Latvia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 37,015 t against 36,252 t in Latvia, a difference of 763 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 106th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 191,326 t | 46,958 t | 144,368 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 187,548 t | 31,206 t | 156,343 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 180,888 t | 36,034 t | 144,854 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 202,301 t | 37,535 t | 164,766 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Hungary or Latvia?
- Hungary, at 37,015 t against 36,252 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Hungary and Latvia?
- 763 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Latvia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Hungary ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 106th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).