Hungary vs Madagascar: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Hungary
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 37,164 t against 37,015 t in Hungary, a difference of 149 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 105th and Madagascar ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 283,707 t | 19,638 t | 264,069 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 546,907 t | 21,967 t | 524,940 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 584,160 t | 29,950 t | 554,210 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 205,446 t | 31,090 t | 174,356 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 187,548 t | 14,809 t | 172,739 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 180,888 t | 23,008 t | 157,880 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 202,301 t | 32,136 t | 170,165 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Hungary or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 37,164 t against 37,015 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Hungary and Madagascar?
- 149 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Madagascar rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Hungary ranks 105th and Madagascar ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).