Italy vs Myanmar: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Italy
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 674,856 t against 596,806 t in Italy, a difference of 78,050 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 23rd and Myanmar ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 6 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 640,451 t | 225,695 t | 414,757 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 947,727 t | 284,281 t | 663,446 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 1.14 million t | 295,589 t | 846,534 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 939,972 t | 305,147 t | 634,826 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 764,142 t | 298,394 t | 465,747 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 629,118 t | 530,353 t | 98,766 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 584,955 t | 605,093 t | 20,138 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Italy or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 674,856 t against 596,806 t in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Italy and Myanmar?
- 78,050 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Myanmar rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Italy ranks 23rd and Myanmar ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).