Jordan vs Sierra Leone: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jordan
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 21,857 t against 20,522 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1,335 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Jordan ranks 109th and Sierra Leone ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1,919 t | 5,368 t | 7,287 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 2,765 t | 6,705 t | 3,940 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 7,743 t | 7,026 t | 716.4 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 8,685 t | 8,478 t | 206.63 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 7,490 t | 16,053 t | 8,563 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 12,982 t | 15,935 t | 2,952 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 16,047 t | 16,891 t | 844.24 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or Sierra Leone?
- Jordan, at 21,857 t against 20,522 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and Sierra Leone?
- 1,335 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Sierra Leone rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Jordan ranks 109th and Sierra Leone ranks 111th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).