Kazakhstan vs Papua New Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports -10,304 t against -45,636 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 35,332 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 184th and Papua New Guinea ranks 181st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 117,848 t | -12,217 t | 130,065 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | -47,415 t | -9,872 t | 37,543 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | -55,757 t | -14,487 t | 41,270 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | -97,825 t | -6,280 t | 91,545 t | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at -10,304 t against -45,636 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 35,332 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 184th and Papua New Guinea ranks 181st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).