Kenya vs Sweden: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kenya
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 155,332 t against 140,663 t in Kenya, a difference of 14,669 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Kenya ranks 62nd and Sweden ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,859 t | 194,299 t | 177,440 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 20,136 t | 245,204 t | 225,069 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 37,715 t | 229,344 t | 191,629 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 48,751 t | 189,741 t | 140,990 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 59,250 t | 151,161 t | 91,911 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 105,149 t | 147,758 t | 42,609 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 130,236 t | 138,445 t | 8,209 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Kenya or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 155,332 t against 140,663 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Kenya and Sweden?
- 14,669 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Sweden rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Kenya ranks 62nd and Sweden ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).