Liberia vs Mauritania: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Liberia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 10,392 t against 9,724 t in Mauritania, a difference of 668 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.
Liberia ranks 136th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,015 t | 4,702 t | 687.13 t | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 4,770 t | 5,527 t | 757.53 t | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 4,418 t | 5,878 t | 1,460 t | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 4,147 t | 10,097 t | 5,950 t | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 7,024 t | 10,620 t | 3,596 t | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 11,955 t | 11,334 t | 620.35 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 11,576 t | 10,832 t | 744.48 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Liberia or Mauritania?
- Liberia, at 10,392 t against 9,724 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Liberia and Mauritania?
- 668 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Mauritania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Liberia ranks 136th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).