Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lithuania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 81,622 t against 75,091 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6,531 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109,654 t | 64,766 t | 44,888 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 115,125 t | 34,213 t | 80,911 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 113,383 t | 52,490 t | 60,893 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 87,907 t | 73,838 t | 14,069 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
- Lithuania, at 81,622 t against 75,091 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
- 6,531 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Lithuania ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).