Luxembourg vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Luxembourg
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 4,368 t against 3,698 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 670 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 143rd and Puerto Rico ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,042 t | 7,281 t | 2,239 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 5,181 t | 6,780 t | 1,599 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 4,216 t | 5,138 t | 922.14 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Luxembourg or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 4,368 t against 3,698 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 670 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Luxembourg ranks 143rd and Puerto Rico ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).