Malawi vs Romania: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malawi
- Romania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 314,983 t against 300,179 t in Romania, a difference of 14,804 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Malawi ranks 33rd and Romania ranks 35th of 201 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,305 t | 398,954 t | 381,649 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 25,824 t | 812,358 t | 786,534 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 31,387 t | 1.10 million t | 1.07 million t | Romania |
| 1990s | 33,176 t | 435,275 t | 402,099 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 69,697 t | 272,369 t | 202,672 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 129,135 t | 272,602 t | 143,466 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 227,282 t | 369,130 t | 141,848 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Malawi or Romania?
- Malawi, at 314,983 t against 300,179 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Malawi and Romania?
- 14,804 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Romania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Malawi ranks 33rd and Romania ranks 35th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).