Mexico vs Polynesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mexico
- Polynesia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 1.08 million t against -1,578 t in Polynesia, a difference of 1.08 million t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 685.8 times Polynesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 13th and Polynesia ranks 16th of 186 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 123,138 t | -6,312 t | 129,450 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 489,754 t | -5,824 t | 495,579 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 971,584 t | -3,791 t | 975,374 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 942,853 t | -1,791 t | 944,644 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 790,683 t | -2,527 t | 793,210 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 943,212 t | -2,271 t | 945,484 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 995,717 t | -1,440 t | 997,157 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Mexico or Polynesia?
- Mexico, at 1.08 million t against -1,578 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Mexico and Polynesia?
- 1.08 million t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Polynesia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Mexico ranks 13th and Polynesia ranks 16th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).