Mozambique vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mozambique
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 96,046 t against 92,830 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 3,216 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mozambique ranks 73rd and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1,521 t | 23,022 t | 24,543 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1,419 t | 39,066 t | 37,647 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 22,430 t | 66,015 t | 43,586 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 29,349 t | 71,387 t | 42,038 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 39,759 t | 97,276 t | 57,517 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 57,975 t | 74,321 t | 16,346 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 78,731 t | 65,009 t | 13,722 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen, Mozambique or Sri Lanka?
- Mozambique, at 96,046 t against 92,830 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen between Mozambique and Sri Lanka?
- 3,216 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen?
- Mozambique ranks 73rd and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).