Myanmar vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Myanmar
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 795,285 t against 674,856 t in Myanmar, a difference of 120,429 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Myanmar ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 314,466 t | 458,041 t | 143,574 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 298,394 t | 389,290 t | 90,896 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 530,353 t | 576,103 t | 45,750 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 605,093 t | 769,590 t | 164,497 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Myanmar or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 795,285 t against 674,856 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Myanmar and Uzbekistan?
- 120,429 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Myanmar ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).