Nepal vs South Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Nepal
- South Sudan
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 66,000 t against 60,749 t in South Sudan, a difference of 5,251 t.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 89th and South Sudan ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 128,056 t | 52,856 t | 75,200 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 102,124 t | 60,901 t | 41,224 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Nepal or South Sudan?
- Nepal, at 66,000 t against 60,749 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Nepal and South Sudan?
- 5,251 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Nepal and South Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Nepal ranks 89th and South Sudan ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).