North Macedonia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- North Macedonia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 12,963 t against 12,906 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 57 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 120th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 119th of 186 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38,257 t | 4,591 t | 33,666 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 21,021 t | 9,210 t | 11,812 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 20,324 t | 13,590 t | 6,734 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 15,204 t | 12,886 t | 2,317 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, North Macedonia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 12,963 t against 12,906 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 57 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- North Macedonia ranks 120th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 119th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).