Philippines vs Uruguay: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Philippines
- Uruguay
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 259,128 t against 248,990 t in Uruguay, a difference of 10,138 t.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Philippines ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -8,302 t | 30,397 t | 38,699 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 1,574 t | 31,154 t | 29,580 t | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 56,022 t | 36,111 t | 19,911 t | Philippines |
| 1990s | 155,368 t | 47,734 t | 107,634 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 166,250 t | 78,849 t | 87,401 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 192,846 t | 166,966 t | 25,879 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 261,237 t | 230,634 t | 30,603 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Philippines or Uruguay?
- Philippines, at 259,128 t against 248,990 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Philippines and Uruguay?
- 10,138 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Philippines and Uruguay rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Philippines ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 41st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).