Serbia vs Uganda: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Serbia
- Uganda
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 86,124 t against 84,469 t in Uganda, a difference of 1,655 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 76th and Uganda ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 159,686 t | 51,296 t | 108,390 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 121,453 t | 76,864 t | 44,590 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 107,861 t | 70,414 t | 37,447 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Serbia or Uganda?
- Serbia, at 86,124 t against 84,469 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Serbia and Uganda?
- 1,655 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uganda?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Uganda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Serbia ranks 76th and Uganda ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).