Sierra Leone vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sierra Leone
- Slovenia
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 20,522 t against 18,607 t in Slovenia, a difference of 1,915 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,831 t | 29,618 t | 20,787 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 16,053 t | 29,461 t | 13,408 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 15,935 t | 18,547 t | 2,613 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 16,891 t | 18,568 t | 1,677 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Sierra Leone or Slovenia?
- Sierra Leone, at 20,522 t against 18,607 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Sierra Leone and Slovenia?
- 1,915 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Sierra Leone and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Sierra Leone ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).