Slovakia vs South Sudan: Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Slovakia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 60,749 t against 50,544 t in Slovakia, a difference of 10,205 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 86th of 185 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81,118 t | 52,856 t | 28,262 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 78,102 t | 60,901 t | 17,202 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen, Slovakia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 60,749 t against 50,544 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen between Slovakia and South Sudan?
- 10,205 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and South Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland nitrogen?
- Slovakia ranks 88th and South Sudan ranks 86th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).