Syrian Arab Republic vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 795,285 t against -15,451 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 810,736 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 51.5 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 18 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 106,573 t | 458,041 t | 351,468 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 106,000 t | 389,290 t | 283,290 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | -1,731 t | 576,103 t | 577,834 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | -14,120 t | 769,590 t | 783,710 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Syrian Arab Republic or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 795,285 t against -15,451 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Syrian Arab Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 810,736 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).