Tajikistan vs Uganda: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Tajikistan
- Uganda
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 84,676 t against 84,469 t in Uganda, a difference of 207 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,654 t | 34,137 t | 2,518 t | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 4,938 t | 38,764 t | 33,825 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 24,116 t | 76,864 t | 52,748 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 69,812 t | 70,414 t | 601.72 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Tajikistan or Uganda?
- Tajikistan, at 84,676 t against 84,469 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Tajikistan and Uganda?
- 207 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Tajikistan and Uganda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Tajikistan ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).