Togo vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen
Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Togo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 75,091 t against 67,555 t in Togo, a difference of 7,536 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Togo ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,127 t | 24,111 t | 18,984 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 5,805 t | 43,357 t | 37,552 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 9,686 t | 52,694 t | 43,008 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 13,794 t | 64,558 t | 50,763 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 14,765 t | 34,213 t | 19,449 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 30,924 t | 52,490 t | 21,566 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 51,644 t | 73,838 t | 22,194 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen, Togo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 75,091 t against 67,555 t in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen between Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 7,536 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Togo and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland nitrogen?
- Togo ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).