Armenia vs Equatorial Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Armenia currently reports -1.24 kg/ha against -1.25 kg/ha in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 156th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.34 kg/ha | -0.1581 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2000s | -2.26 kg/ha | -0.9789 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -2.89 kg/ha | -1.3 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | -0.5019 kg/ha | -1.33 kg/ha | 0.8252 kg/ha | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Armenia or Equatorial Guinea?
- Armenia, at -1.24 kg/ha against -1.25 kg/ha in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Armenia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 156th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).