Bahamas vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Bahamas
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 16.05 kg/ha against 15.22 kg/ha in Bahamas, a difference of 0.83 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Bahamas ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.26 kg/ha | 8.85 kg/ha | 10.41 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 22.24 kg/ha | 5.45 kg/ha | 16.79 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 21.64 kg/ha | 11.34 kg/ha | 10.3 kg/ha | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 15.2 kg/ha | 13.12 kg/ha | 2.08 kg/ha | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Bahamas or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 16.05 kg/ha against 15.22 kg/ha in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Bahamas and Uzbekistan?
- 0.83 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Bahamas ranks 34th and Uzbekistan ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).