China vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

China
19.97 kg/ha
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS)
-0.5998 kg/ha
in 2023
China rank
25th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
25th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • China
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
0102030196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 19.97 kg/ha against -0.5998 kg/ha in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 20.57 kg/ha.

That makes China's figure about 33.3 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.

China ranks 25th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 25th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Small island developing States (SIDS) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
1960s -0.558 kg/ha 4.34 kg/ha 4.9 kg/ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
1970s 2.55 kg/ha 3.69 kg/ha 1.14 kg/ha Small island developing States (SIDS)
1980s 7.7 kg/ha 3.5 kg/ha 4.2 kg/ha China
1990s 18.64 kg/ha 2.53 kg/ha 16.11 kg/ha China
2000s 25.86 kg/ha 1.52 kg/ha 24.34 kg/ha China
2010s 29.26 kg/ha 2.15 kg/ha 27.1 kg/ha China
2020s 20.98 kg/ha 0.1312 kg/ha 20.85 kg/ha China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, China or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
China, at 19.97 kg/ha against -0.5998 kg/ha in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between China and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
20.57 kg/ha, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
China ranks 25th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/china/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/china/small-island-developing-states-sids/">China vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).