Comoros vs Czechia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Comoros
- Czechia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports -3.32 kg/ha against -3.85 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.53 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Comoros ranks 184th and Czechia ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2 kg/ha | 5.78 kg/ha | 7.78 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | -2.16 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | 4.69 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | -3.38 kg/ha | -0.696 kg/ha | 2.68 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | -3.38 kg/ha | -3.49 kg/ha | 0.1122 kg/ha | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Comoros or Czechia?
- Comoros, at -3.32 kg/ha against -3.85 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Comoros and Czechia?
- 0.53 kg/ha, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Czechia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Comoros ranks 184th and Czechia ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).