Congo vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Congo
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Congo currently reports -0.8212 kg/ha against -0.8968 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0756 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Congo ranks 150th and Kazakhstan ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3141 kg/ha | 0.8603 kg/ha | 1.17 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | -1.03 kg/ha | -0.8708 kg/ha | 0.1562 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | -1.22 kg/ha | -1.04 kg/ha | 0.1808 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | -0.8835 kg/ha | -1.11 kg/ha | 0.2314 kg/ha | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Congo or Kazakhstan?
- Congo, at -0.8212 kg/ha against -0.8968 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0756 kg/ha, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Congo ranks 150th and Kazakhstan ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).