Congo vs Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Congo
-0.8212 kg/ha
in 2023
Sudan
-0.8747 kg/ha
in 2023
Congo rank
150th
Sudan rank
152nd

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Congo
  • Sudan
-1.5-1-0.50196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports -0.8212 kg/ha against -0.8747 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.0535 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Congo ranks 150th and Sudan ranks 152nd of 201 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s -1.23 kg/ha -0.9914 kg/ha 0.2366 kg/ha Sudan
2020s -0.8835 kg/ha -1.22 kg/ha 0.3374 kg/ha Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Congo or Sudan?
Congo, at -0.8212 kg/ha against -0.8747 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Congo and Sudan?
0.0535 kg/ha, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Congo and Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Congo ranks 150th and Sudan ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).