Costa Rica vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Costa Rica
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 16.05 kg/ha against 15.57 kg/ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.48 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 33rd and Uzbekistan ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.04 kg/ha | 8.85 kg/ha | 13.19 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 21.18 kg/ha | 5.45 kg/ha | 15.73 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 18.1 kg/ha | 11.34 kg/ha | 6.76 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 14.73 kg/ha | 13.12 kg/ha | 1.61 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Costa Rica or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 16.05 kg/ha against 15.57 kg/ha in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Costa Rica and Uzbekistan?
- 0.48 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Costa Rica ranks 33rd and Uzbekistan ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).