Czechoslovakia vs Mauritius: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports -0.7234 kg/ha against -0.8596 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 0.1362 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 151st and Mauritius ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.54 kg/ha | 4.73 kg/ha | 7.81 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 21.91 kg/ha | -4.5 kg/ha | 26.41 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 26.42 kg/ha | -0.6995 kg/ha | 27.12 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 4.7 kg/ha | -0.7086 kg/ha | 5.41 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at -0.7234 kg/ha against -0.8596 kg/ha in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Mauritius?
- 0.1362 kg/ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Mauritius rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 151st and Mauritius ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).