Czechoslovakia vs Myanmar: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports -0.8596 kg/ha against -0.9031 kg/ha in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0435 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 151st and Myanmar ranks 154th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.54 kg/ha | 0.6078 kg/ha | 11.93 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 21.91 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | 20.65 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 26.42 kg/ha | 1.41 kg/ha | 25.02 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 4.7 kg/ha | 0.4399 kg/ha | 4.26 kg/ha | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Myanmar?
- Czechoslovakia, at -0.8596 kg/ha against -0.9031 kg/ha in Myanmar as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Myanmar?
- 0.0435 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Myanmar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Myanmar rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 151st and Myanmar ranks 154th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).