Eritrea vs Uganda: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Uganda
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports -0.4938 kg/ha against -0.5357 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.0419 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 140th and Uganda ranks 141st of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2206 kg/ha | -1.52 kg/ha | 1.75 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.6087 kg/ha | -1.57 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | -0.4007 kg/ha | -0.908 kg/ha | 0.5073 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | -0.4931 kg/ha | -0.8497 kg/ha | 0.3565 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eritrea or Uganda?
- Eritrea, at -0.4938 kg/ha against -0.5357 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eritrea and Uganda?
- 0.0419 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Uganda?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Uganda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 140th and Uganda ranks 141st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).