Estonia vs Suriname: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Suriname
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.9208 kg/ha against 0.6567 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 0.2641 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.79 kg/ha | -3.14 kg/ha | 9.92 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 5.07 kg/ha | 4.1 kg/ha | 0.9715 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 3.39 kg/ha | 1.26 kg/ha | 2.14 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 1.57 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | 0.5411 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Estonia or Suriname?
- Estonia, at 0.9208 kg/ha against 0.6567 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Estonia and Suriname?
- 0.2641 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Suriname rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).