Fiji vs Kyrgyzstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3.69 kg/ha against 3.48 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0.21 kg/ha.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Fiji ranks 81st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 78th of 185 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.9 kg/ha | 0.6437 kg/ha | 2.26 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2000s | -0.9013 kg/ha | -1.02 kg/ha | 0.1222 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 4.6 kg/ha | 1.55 kg/ha | 3.05 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2020s | 6.62 kg/ha | 3.66 kg/ha | 2.96 kg/ha | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Fiji or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3.69 kg/ha against 3.48 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Fiji and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.21 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 81st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 78th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).