Honduras vs Turkmenistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Honduras
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 11.28 kg/ha against 9.47 kg/ha in Honduras, a difference of 1.81 kg/ha.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Honduras ranks 45th and Turkmenistan ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.94 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | 2.89 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2000s | 4.65 kg/ha | -1.96 kg/ha | 6.61 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2010s | 8.26 kg/ha | 4.04 kg/ha | 4.22 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2020s | 9.11 kg/ha | 7.32 kg/ha | 1.79 kg/ha | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Honduras or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 11.28 kg/ha against 9.47 kg/ha in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Honduras and Turkmenistan?
- 1.81 kg/ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Turkmenistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Honduras ranks 45th and Turkmenistan ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).