Kazakhstan vs Myanmar: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Myanmar
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports -0.8968 kg/ha against -0.9031 kg/ha in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0063 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 153rd and Myanmar ranks 154th of 201 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8603 kg/ha | 0.0498 kg/ha | 0.8105 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | -0.8708 kg/ha | -3.65 kg/ha | 2.78 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | -1.04 kg/ha | -1.08 kg/ha | 0.0399 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | -1.11 kg/ha | -1.2 kg/ha | 0.0867 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kazakhstan or Myanmar?
- Kazakhstan, at -0.8968 kg/ha against -0.9031 kg/ha in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kazakhstan and Myanmar?
- 0.0063 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Myanmar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Myanmar rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 153rd and Myanmar ranks 154th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).