Lithuania vs Paraguay: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports -3.28 kg/ha against -3.35 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 185th and Paraguay ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.46 kg/ha | -2.66 kg/ha | 6.12 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 3.9 kg/ha | 2.55 kg/ha | 1.36 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.4442 kg/ha | 0.2355 kg/ha | 0.2087 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | -3.19 kg/ha | -1.36 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Lithuania or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at -3.28 kg/ha against -3.35 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Lithuania and Paraguay?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Paraguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Paraguay rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 185th and Paraguay ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).