Malawi vs Tajikistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 3.66 kg/ha against 3.44 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.22 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 82nd and Tajikistan ranks 79th of 185 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6842 kg/ha | 10.14 kg/ha | 10.82 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | -1.23 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | 3.57 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | -0.9464 kg/ha | 2.4 kg/ha | 3.35 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 2.57 kg/ha | 3.94 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Malawi or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 3.66 kg/ha against 3.44 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 0.22 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Tajikistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 82nd and Tajikistan ranks 79th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).