Mauritius vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Mauritius
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports -0.7027 kg/ha against -0.7234 kg/ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0207 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 148th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.73 kg/ha | 2.82 kg/ha | 1.91 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 1970s | -4.5 kg/ha | 4.07 kg/ha | 8.56 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | -0.6995 kg/ha | 5.98 kg/ha | 6.68 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | -0.0956 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | 1.76 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Mauritius or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at -0.7027 kg/ha against -0.7234 kg/ha in Mauritius as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Mauritius and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.0207 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Mauritius and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Mauritius ranks 148th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).